Hi,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 18:23:34 +, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Ignoring a dependency is probably bettter than a deadlock which makes
the system unusable, to be sure
There's a third option. Make need exit with nonzero status if it's
called recursively.
Then the script just says
set -e
need foo
Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
obviously debian sid is from now on capable of supporting several init
script schemes. Now I wonder if it is now possible to package R. Goochs
simpleinit [1]. But I have some questions:
Just for your information, a Debian user can choose between two
concurrent
Hi,
I don't know if I got it wrong, but AFAIK runlevels work this way in
Gooch's simpleinit:
A runlevel is just any script whose name makes it being called by
/sbin/init on a certain runlevel, like
/etc/init.d/runlevel.3
There is nothing special about this script, it could do anything
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 03:43:25PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I am really not trying to replace the sysvinit scheme as a default one,
and I don't think anybody else is. But having the option to use a
different one is a goal worth going for.
You might be interested in the runit and
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 03:43:25PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
A runlevel is just any script whose name makes it being called by
/sbin/init on a certain runlevel, like
/etc/init.d/runlevel.3
There is nothing special about this script, it could do anything you
want. Usually I think
Hi Henrique,
It is good to see that there is actually work done on it. Obviously you
are more into the topic (and you are a debian developer), so It's up to
me to offer you help with that, not the other way around :-)
After reading through your paper (nice work), it looks to me as if the
the
One big problem about Richard Gooch's simpleinit is that it is
functionally very different from the standard systme V init scripts.
Specifically, he always assumes that runlevel n+1 is always a superset
of runlevel n, and that in order to get to runlevel n+1, you must
first start up all of the
Hi,
obviously debian sid is from now on capable of supporting several init
script schemes. Now I wonder if it is now possible to package R. Goochs
simpleinit [1]. But I have some questions:
* Would that require replacing sysv-rc or sysvinit+sysv-rc? I think
R.Goochs /sbin/init is capable of
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Joachim Breitner wrote:
* The /etc/init.d/ scripts would need to add need otherscript (and
sometimes provide something). As I think it is a very bad idea to edit
these scripts in our post-install (and try to reedit them in
pre-remove)) one would have to file bugs agains
On 26 Apr 2003, Joachim Breitner wrote:
* The /etc/init.d/ scripts would need to add need otherscript (and
sometimes provide something). As I think it is a very bad idea to edit
these scripts in our post-install (and try to reedit them in
pre-remove)) one would have to file bugs agains
On Sat Apr 26, 07:36pm +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
* The /etc/init.d/ scripts would need to add need otherscript (and
sometimes provide something). As I think it is a very bad idea to edit
these scripts in our post-install (and try to reedit them in
pre-remove)) one would have to file bugs
11 matches
Mail list logo
