The system is back up. If you have further trouble, please let us know.
Thanks.
Simon Paillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:41:51PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 06:40:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Is there any advantage for that default in Debian? Anyone who cares about
> > network proximity on round-robin IPv4 already knows to pick one host and
> > to stop using the
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 06:40:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Is there any advantage for that default in Debian? Anyone who cares about
> network proximity on round-robin IPv4 already knows to pick one host and
> to stop using the round-robin names.
There's a configure option for
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:21:02PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > Imho Debian's ctte should decide about this, and if they decide to have
> > sorted IPv4 addresses by default, somebody needs to take care that _ALL_
> > programs using IPv4 are chan
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:21:02PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Imho Debian's ctte should decide about this, and if they decide to have
> sorted IPv4 addresses by default, somebody needs to take care that _ALL_
> programs using IPv4 are changed. Including browsers, IM clients and all
> daemons wh
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I opened an upstream bug report with ntp. But I would rather see the
> > default get changed. I think there are just too many
> > people/applications that assume a certain behaviour that's different
> > then what we have now.
> >
> Exactly, especia
>
> I opened an upstream bug report with ntp. But I would rather see the
> default get changed. I think there are just too many
> people/applications that assume a certain behaviour that's different
> then what we have now.
>
>
Exactly, especially in IPv4 round robin using DNS is a a de-facto
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:41:51PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> 35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
> unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
>
> This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
Its admin are in BCC of this mail.
> It is also still listed
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
>>
>> Using "host" from bind9-host,
>> $ host http.us.debian.org
>> http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
>> http.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7
>> http.us.debian.org has ad
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:19:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/438179
>
> This bug was closed by adding a config option. Why wasn't it cloned to
> all the network clients (apt, ntp, etc) that exhibit undesirable
> behavior due to this change in glibc
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> See http://bugs.debian.org/438179
This bug was closed by adding a config option. Why wasn't it cloned to
all the network clients (apt, ntp, etc) that exhibit undesirable
behavior due to this change in glibc? Perhaps because the list is too
long for anyone to enumerate it.
--
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
>
> Using "host" from bind9-host,
> $ host http.us.debian.org
> http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
> http.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7
> http.us.debian.org has address 35.9.37.225
> http.us.debian.org has addres
On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 09:24:24 -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> However, libc6 resolv+ (I think - can someone confirm who is to
> blame?) goes out of its way to *sort* the list by IP number and thus
> thwarts the round-robin. Aptitude (and wget, &c) *always* choose
> 35.9.37.225. This server mus
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> I also notice that we have 4 servers listed under the name
> "http.us.debian.org"
>
> Using "host" from bind9-host,
> $ host http.us.debian.org
> http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
> http.us.debian.org has address 204.15
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> 35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
> unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
>
> This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
>
> It is also still listed at http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
>
> It is
Hi,
On Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 20:41:51 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
> unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
>
> This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
created as RT#171
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]#
I get the same thing as well.
Lots of my machines hang on pulling package lists sometimes, and they
hang for sure on package updates.
Tom
On Wed, Sep
05, 2007 at 08:41:51PM
-0500,
John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
> unreachable
Hi,
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
It is also still listed at http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
It is listed "bad" at http://mirror.debian.org/status.html
Can
18 matches
Mail list logo
