* Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 01:18]:
> >Has there been any agreement about what to do with cantus and cantus3?
> >Since you're the maintainer of cantus3 and you suggest it's removal,
> >can you go ahead and file a bug report on ftp.d.o?
>
> I don't like the idea of removing cantus3
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-06 22:10]:
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality originally present in cantus.
And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
have no interest neither in incorporating bug f
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-03 14:54]:
> I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next
> few days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of
> these packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never
> been part of a stable release;
* Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-06 22:10]:
> >>From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
> > functionality originally present in cantus.
>
> And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
> have no interest neither in incorporating bug fixes nor
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:26:34PM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > Your latest comment in #259581 is completely different from this --
> > please keep the relevant wnpp bug in the loop for stuff like this!
> >
> > Specifical
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> Your latest comment in #259581 is completely different from this --
> please keep the relevant wnpp bug in the loop for stuff like this!
>
> Specifically, your latest recorded comment about bbconf is "No, I will
> not take care a
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
> > days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
> > packages have been
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:01 -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
>
> So, I recently sent an email to the bbconf upstream to know if they're
> going to keep working on it. Therefore, I think that we should wait a
> bit to know his answers and then I will reply.
Quoting Upstream:
"Hm. Well, I agree, it
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
> days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
> packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never been part
> of a stable release;
Ari Pollak wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
>>#287985: O: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files
>>Reported by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 123 days old.
>>obsoleted by cantus3 which is packaged already
>
>
>>From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually prov
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> #287985: O: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files
> Reported by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 123 days old.
> obsoleted by cantus3 which is packaged already
>From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Fran?ois-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 11:05]:
> > Both are gone of http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage, I
> > guess that means I'm too late?
>
> No, they are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnp
* François-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 11:05]:
> Both are gone of http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage, I
> guess that means I'm too late?
No, they are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned
"rfa_bypackage" is for packages which are RFA: Request For Adopt
On May 4, 2005 04:38 am, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hello François,
>
> * François-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 10:08]:
> > On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > #297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
> > > Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hello François,
* François-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 10:08]:
> On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > #297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
> > Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 63 days old.
> >
> > #297427: O: langband-dat
François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
>On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
>
>>#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
>>Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 63 days old.
>>
>>#297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
>>langband e
On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> #297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
> Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 63 days old.
>
> #297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
> langband engine Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg"
I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never been part
of a stable release; none of them have any reverse (build-)dependencies.
#259581: O: b
18 matches
Mail list logo
