Il giorno Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:37:26 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" ha scritto:
> > * 1 package has temporary dependency screwup
> What specifically does "temporary dependency screwup" mean?
http://people.debian.org/~dktrkranz/scons-2.0/depwait/gtkrsync_1.0.4-sid-i386-20100604-075618.22.log
gtkrsync req
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 16:30 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> So, I rebuilt reverse dependencies of SCons to spot some problems, and I
> published my results online. Here is a brief summary:
>
> * 58 packages build-depending on SCons
> * 53 packages built successfully (2 of them needed sourceful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:12:52 -0400
Felipe Sateler ha scritto:
> Does SCons finally support SONAMES or do we still have to manually do
> that? I don't see any reference to that in the release text.
I don't think so. I remember I've seen a requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/06/10 10:30, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> SCons developers are close to release new major release of SCons, which
> started to deprecate some obsolete function and dropped support for
> Python code older than 2.4. Full release notes can
Hello,
SCons developers are close to release new major release of SCons, which
started to deprecate some obsolete function and dropped support for
Python code older than 2.4. Full release notes can be found here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/scons/files/scons/2.0.0.beta.20100531/RELEASE.txt/vie
5 matches
Mail list logo
