On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 09:23:07AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 12:49:29PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
> >
> > > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs?
> > >
> > > Not
Joel Klecker writes:
> At 20:00 +0200 1999-09-21, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>The egcs packages are used to build the libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9
> >packages and therefore are still in potato. For the release they have
> >to be modified to build the runtime libraries only (if you want to
> >st
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 12:49:29PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
>
> > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs?
> >
> > Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.
>
> Well, egcs
At 20:00 +0200 1999-09-21, Matthias Klose wrote:
The egcs packages are used to build the libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9
packages and therefore are still in potato. For the release they have
to be modified to build the runtime libraries only (if you want to
step forward for this task, you are welcome
Dale Scheetz writes:
> On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
>
> > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs?
> >
> > Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.
>
> Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source ar
Ben Collins writes:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
> > potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
> > available in the archives. Which one is being used to build
On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs?
>
> Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.
Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source archives, so someone must be
using it. egcs64 is c
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs?
Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.
- Ruud de Rooij.
--
ruud de rooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://ruud.org
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
> > potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
> > available in the archives. Which one is bei
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
> potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
> available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system?
> Will either work?
OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system?
Will either work? The libraries are pretty self explanitory, with the
exception of ncurs
11 matches
Mail list logo