Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 09:23:07AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 12:49:29PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote: > > > > > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? > > > > > > Not

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Joel Klecker writes: > At 20:00 +0200 1999-09-21, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>The egcs packages are used to build the libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9 > >packages and therefore are still in potato. For the release they have > >to be modified to build the runtime libraries only (if you want to > >st

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 12:49:29PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote: > > > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? > > > > Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore. > > Well, egcs

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Joel Klecker
At 20:00 +0200 1999-09-21, Matthias Klose wrote: The egcs packages are used to build the libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9 packages and therefore are still in potato. For the release they have to be modified to build the runtime libraries only (if you want to step forward for this task, you are welcome

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Dale Scheetz writes: > On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote: > > > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? > > > > Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore. > > Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source ar

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben Collins writes: > On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to > > potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions > > available in the archives. Which one is being used to build

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote: > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? > > Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore. Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source archives, so someone must be using it. egcs64 is c

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Ruud de Rooij
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore. - Ruud de Rooij. -- ruud de rooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://ruud.org

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to > > potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions > > available in the archives. Which one is bei

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to > potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions > available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system? > Will either work?

Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Dale Scheetz
OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system? Will either work? The libraries are pretty self explanitory, with the exception of ncurs