On 18/05/08 at 16:27 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:18:12PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > But the problem we want to solve is making things easier for
> > upstreams.
>
> Oh? When I read the proposal, I understood that the problem we want to
> solve is about tracking cha
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:05:41PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 18/05/08 at 16:27 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:18:12PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > But the problem we want to solve is making things easier for
> > > upstreams.
> >
> > Oh? When I read the prop
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 17:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 18/05/08 at 16:27 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:18:12PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > But the problem we want to solve is making things easier for
> > > upstreams.
> >
> > Oh? When I read the proposal, I
2008/5/18 Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem I am interested in solving is:
> It is currently difficult for people not involved in Debian
> development (upstream, other distros, users) to know which patches we
> applied, the reason for the patch, and whether they should be
> inte
On 18/05/08 at 16:44 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 17:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 18/05/08 at 16:27 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:18:12PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > > But the problem we want to solve is making things easier for
>
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 18:22 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > The problem I am interested in solving is:
> > > It is currently difficult for people not involved in Debian
> > > development (upstream, other distros, users) to know which patches we
> > > applied, the reason for the patch, and
(please don't remove Ccs. I added one for a reason)
On 18/05/08 at 18:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 18:22 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > The problem I am interested in solving is:
> > > > It is currently difficult for people not involved in Debian
> > > > develop
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 19:39 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (please don't remove Ccs. I added one for a reason)
(Not sure you want d-devel and direct since I know you are subscribed,
so removed that one. :-))
> > > That sounds logical to have both:
> > > - they know that distro devs are not perfec
(you can skip to the end for a summary of what I think we agree on)
On 18/05/08 at 19:49 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > I still like the two-stage closure option because sometimes we just need
> > > to upload a fix before an upstream release can be made and the bug
> > > submitter should know t
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 21:40 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (you can skip to the end for a summary of what I think we agree on)
> > > The only
> > > thing that he would additionaly get is a notification when the change is
> > > applied upstream and fixed in Debian by a new upstream version.
> >
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
