Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the Solutions Linux expo in Paris, the DD's present at the
> Debian booth have been approached by a representative from Trend Micro
> Corp. who develops and sells security software (the most well known
> being probably a virus scanning software and such similar sof
On 3 Feb 2005, at 5:53 pm, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hi,
as I understand myself as someone aware of the support problems of
software problems, I would like to point to 2 problems:
1. the Debian Kernel is a bit different from the kernel.org Kernel;
example: at work we used the Apani VPN client, which d
Hi,
as I understand myself as someone aware of the support problems of
software problems, I would like to point to 2 problems:
1. the Debian Kernel is a bit different from the kernel.org Kernel;
example: at work we used the Apani VPN client, which did work under all
kind of RedHat/SuSE kernel,
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:55:51PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
> > people?? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
> > as proprietary SW vendo
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:46:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> With the proviso that static linking against libc6 is more likely to
> introduce ABI problems via nss than just dynamically linking against an old
> libc6 ABI (i.e., GLIBC_2.0 or GLIBC_2.1).
Not to mention the LGPL too. Static lin
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 06.35, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> I think you meant to ask, "Why would anyone want to execute the C
> library?"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/libc.so.6
Ok, this is off topic for this thread, but still, strangely:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-2.3.2.s
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:06:14PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> Beyond that I think the other poster was right, really there
> should be more focus on linking statically, packing in an open
> format such as .tar.gz not .rpm and miminal links to the kernel
> or OS.
With the proviso that static
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 14:27 -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:01:25PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > > I've been under the impression that the only machine-level
> > > incompatibilities are really ker
> I don't like to pass the buck, yet I can't see a way that Debian, as
> it is can support them directly. Perhaps they ought to look to the
I think they don't need support from Debian. They just need to know
where to discuss the issues they are concerned with.
In understand this is not really a
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:01:25PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I've been under the impression that the only machine-level
> > incompatibilities are really kernel and driver issues and not issues
> > with Debian per se.
>
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:57:08PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
> > > people ? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
> > > as proprietary SW vendors needing technical information about the way
> > >
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:57:08PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, I'm not the software vendor here..:-)
>
> As far as I've inderstood, this product induces some interaction at
> kernel-level and the vendor developers may have concerns about the
> kernel on the distribution they want to s
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> I've been under the impression that the only machine-level
> incompatibilities are really kernel and driver issues and not issues
> with Debian per se.
>
> Can you be a little more specific?
>
Currently for instance Matlab 6.5+ canno
> > Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
> > people ? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
> > as proprietary SW vendors needing technical information about the way
> > to support Debian ?
>
> It isn't clear to me what sort of compatibility iss
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
> people?? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
> as proprietary SW vendors needing technical information about the way
> to support Debian?
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the Solutions Linux expo in Paris, the DD's present at the
> Debian booth have been approached by a representative from Trend Micro
> Corp. who develops and sells security software (the most well known
> being probably a vi
During the Solutions Linux expo in Paris, the DD's present at the
Debian booth have been approached by a representative from Trend Micro
Corp. who develops and sells security software (the most well known
being probably a virus scanning software and such similar software
suites).
We ended with a v
17 matches
Mail list logo
