Why acroread is popular (Was: Re: Popular packages in Ubuntu that is missing in Debian/main)

2008-12-02 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Michelle Konzack wrote: > ..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several > 100 MByte of useless GNOME and KDE libs! 'evince-gtk' package pulls much less dependencies, I am using it with XFCE. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainia

Re: Why acroread is popular (Was: Re: Popular packages in Ubuntu that is missing in Debian/main)

2008-12-02 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 17:15 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Michelle Konzack wrote: > > ..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several > > 100 MByte of useless GNOME and KDE libs! > 'evince-gtk' package pulls much less dependencies, I am using it with XFCE. There's al

Re: Why acroread is popular (Was: Re: Popular packages in Ubuntu that is missing in Debian/main)

2008-12-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Michelle Konzack wrote: >> ..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several >> 100 MByte of useless GNOME and KDE libs! > 'evince-gtk' package pulls much less dependencies, I am using it with XFCE. Since 2.24 (which is in experimental) the evinc

Re: Why acroread is popular (Was: Re: Popular packages in Ubuntu that is missing in Debian/main)

2008-12-02 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar, 2008-12-02 at 16:33 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > There's also epdfview, described as "in the lines of Evince but > without > using the GNOME libraries". > > It uses Poppler, but otherwise I have no idea how it compares to > Evince. It's really nice and light, but not as feature-rich

Re: Why acroread is popular (Was: Re: Popular packages in Ubuntu that is missing in Debian/main)

2008-12-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 02 décembre 2008 à 19:08 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > Since 2.24 (which is in experimental) the evince package doesn't link to > unneeded dependencies anymore, making the evince-gtk package pointless. So now > you will be able to install the evince package with the same result