Re: Wine status

2011-09-12 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:00:36 +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > Ove Kåven schrieb am 11.09.2011 14:56: >> Den 11. sep. 2011 13:44, skrev Cesare Leonardi: >>> In the recent past upstream site started to advertise this as Wine Debian >>> package: http://dev.carbon-project.org/debian/wine-unst

Re: Wine status

2011-09-11 Thread Ove Kåven
Den 11. sep. 2011 16:00, skrev Kai Wasserbäch: > (@Ove: I've already a multiarch-ready branch on my system which uses a > significantly simplified debian/rules. If you are interested in that, let me > know and I put it up somewhere.) Not really. I always try to keep the packages possible to build

Re: Wine status

2011-09-11 Thread Kai Wasserbäch
Dear Cesare, dear Ove, Ove Kåven schrieb am 11.09.2011 14:56: > Den 11. sep. 2011 13:44, skrev Cesare Leonardi: >> In the recent past upstream site started to advertise this as Wine Debian >> package: http://dev.carbon-project.org/debian/wine-unstable/ I had nothing to do with that, I actually wa

Re: Wine status

2011-09-11 Thread Cesare Leonardi
On 11/09/2011 14:56, Ove Kåven wrote: Because of the work and time needed for compliance with Debian's strict DFSG requirements (in addition to having to package a full mingw toolchain to compile it, upstream's Gecko package had to undergo a repackaging for DFSG compliance, plus a complete licens

Re: Wine status

2011-09-11 Thread Ove Kåven
Den 11. sep. 2011 13:44, skrev Cesare Leonardi: > Upstream is 1.2.3 (stable) and 1.3.28 (development) and they looks like > quite active releasing new versions. Of course. > In Debian we have two Wine packages: > - wine 1.0.1 (1.1.24 in experimental) > - wine-unstable 1.1.35 It's slightly newe

Re: Wine status

2011-09-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote: > I'd like to know if someone has more info on the Wine package status. > From the outside and after searching from time to time on the internet, it's > still not clear to me what's the reason why this package is so old. It is probably a bet

Wine status

2011-09-11 Thread Cesare Leonardi
Hi all. I'd like to know if someone has more info on the Wine package status. From the outside and after searching from time to time on the internet, it's still not clear to me what's the reason why this package is so old. Upstream is 1.2.3 (stable) and 1.3.28 (development) and they looks like