On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:50:11PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 05:14:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:41:15AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > > > "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Along similar lines, if a have a "closes: #
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 05:14:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:41:15AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > > "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Along similar lines, if a have a "closes: #nnn" in my changelog for
> > package X, but the bug is for package Y
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:41:15AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian> What is the preferred way of closing bugs that are not bugs
> Brian> (e.g. mistake by the submitter)? -- Brian May
> Brian> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Has the "reas
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> What is the preferred way of closing bugs that are not bugs
Brian> (e.g. mistake by the submitter)? -- Brian May
Brian> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has the "reassign" command changed? What versions apply if you
reassign a bug to a
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:08:17AM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> It seems. I did it for #297927: after sending a 'close 297927' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], the BTS informed me that it was deprecated. I sent
> another mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'Version: 0.9.23-1', and it is
> now in the BTS as ``F
Scribit Stefano Zacchiroli dies 19/10/2005 hora 11:06:
> 1) once a bug as been closed - erroneously I would say - mailing
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] without the "Version:" pseudo header, is
> there a way to push the version information to the bts?
It seems. I did it for #297927: after sending a 'close 29
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:06:14 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:44:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Closing without a version header retains the traditional semantics of
> > marking the bug closed in all versions.
>
> Two questions:
> 1) once a bug as been clos
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:44:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Closing without a version header retains the traditional semantics of
> marking the bug closed in all versions.
Two questions:
1) once a bug as been closed - erroneously I would say - mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] without the "Versio
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 05:56:47PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey> 2. If you forget a changelog entry, or find out about a
> Joey> fix (such as a fix for a security hole) after your upload,
> Joey> send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> 2. If you forget a changelog entry, or find out about a
Joey> fix (such as a fix for a security hole) after your upload,
Joey> send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as before, but
Joey> include a "Version:" pseudo-header[2].
W
Hi Joey
Joey Hess wrote:
> In the process of my work on the testing security team, I've noticed
> that many developers still seem to be unfamiliar with how to use the new
> version tracking features[1] of the Debian BTS.
< ... >
> I thought I'd conclude with an example of how to do it right, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
