Le mercredi 23 juillet 2014 à 16:12 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Someone with more detailed desktop knowledge should read this over and
correct it as necessary. This is just my understanding of what's going
on, and I don't work with the software in question and could be wrong in
some
However, you're doing this during boot, so there *are* no active users,
since the system hasn't come up far enough to let anyone log in yet. So
it makes sense that you don't get a prompt.
Does that mean that the new pid 1 expects users to be logged in before it
starts the system?
-- Juliusz
Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr writes:
However, you're doing this during boot, so there *are* no active users,
since the system hasn't come up far enough to let anyone log in yet. So
it makes sense that you don't get a prompt.
Does that mean that the new pid 1 expects
On 2014-07-22 19:54:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
logind is also not mandatory in Debian now. It's just required, upstream,
by all the major desktop environments.
Not just by all the major desktop environments. It is also needed
by hplip via dependencies[*], which is quite surprising for a
HP
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net writes:
On 2014-07-22 19:54:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
logind is also not mandatory in Debian now. It's just required,
upstream, by all the major desktop environments.
Not just by all the major desktop environments. It is also needed by
hplip via
Hi,
(as this thread has already attracted two interesting replies, I'll try
again to convey the message which has not been heard yet... I don't have high
hopes this thread won't become a flamefest, but I want to at least try to kill
the flames before they explode...)
(And if you know systemd,
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Julian Gilbey wrote:
For me, this is a killer, as I still do not know how to solve the
problem I asked a while back on debian-user
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/04/msg01286.html): in
summary, I need to
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:26:47AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I just tried updating testing on my system. I currently use
sysvinit-core (reasons below), but aptitude is telling me that I
should remove this in favour of systemd-sysv. Hmm,
Hi Steve,
thanks for the technical details, much appreciated.
On Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
There was nothing in Julian's message which was a rant, so I don't think
this response is called for.
Well, the subject (and also the body) conveyed the wrong message, that systemd
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:58:32AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Well, the subject (and also the body) conveyed the wrong message, that
systemd
is mandatory in Debian now. Which - as you also said - is wrong, at least for
two reasons: a.) it's logind, not systemd and b.) only desktops are
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:58:32AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Well, the subject (and also the body) conveyed the wrong message, that
systemd is mandatory in Debian now. Which - as you also said - is
wrong, at least for two reasons: a.) it's logind,
11 matches
Mail list logo
