On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:58:55 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Update list.
>
> bti: #588235
The new upstream release with oauth support is ready for upload, it
just waits for liboauth (#581601).
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
: :'
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:52:44 -0400
Hideki Yamane wrote:
Update list.
bisho: not affected
choqok: OK
gtwitter: removed from Debian archive
libmojito0: RM request from maintainer
libnet-twitter-lite-perl: OK
libnet-twitte
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:52:44 -0400, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> status update for twitter client/library OAuth support in Debian
> bti: #588235
Upstream is aware, and work in an oauth branch has started.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:40:07 +0900
Hideki Yamane wrote:
status update for twitter client/library OAuth support in Debian
And ITP:liboauth may be able to solve this problem in some package
(thanks for information, Luke Cycon)
see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581601
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:08:02 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Okay, I propose once python-twitter package should be removed from testing.
> > If we're lucky :), it'll be in squeeze, again.
>
> You should probably file a RC bug so that it doesn’t migrate again
> without being fixed first.
Tha
Le mercredi 30 juin 2010 à 12:47 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300
> Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> > Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last
> > commit is
> > from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding oauth.
> > Also t
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300
Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last
> commit is
> from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding oauth.
> Also the author from oauth-python-twitter (which can be integrated in some
> way with
2010-06-28, Hideki Yamane:
> Hi,
>
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
>
> These lists are assumed to be affected packages (got with "apt-cache search
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> plasma-widgets-addons (microblog widget)
OAuth support added upstream:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242048
Cheers,
Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkwqP1sACgkQXjXn6T
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:54:55PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Waiting for qoauth [1].
>
> Thanks! I haven't heard about it. Choqok author seems to make a fork from
> that, see http://momeny.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/kde-oauth/#comment-248
There's no need for a qoauth fork. The change is be
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Thanks, added. Is plasma part of KDE, right? If so, as Carlos suggests
> qoauth (or forked one) will help that if someone would package it, I guess.
Noah Meyerhans (choqok maintainer) took over the qoauth ITP some days
ago, so I'm sure th
Hi Sune,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:25:10 + (UTC)
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> plasma-widgets-addons (microblog widget)
Thanks, added. Is plasma part of KDE, right? If so, as Carlos suggests
qoauth (or forked one) will help that if someone would package it, I guess.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane
Hi Carlos,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:28:00 +0200
Carlos Galisteo wrote:
> Waiting for qoauth [1].
Thanks! I haven't heard about it. Choqok author seems to make a fork from
that, see http://momeny.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/kde-oauth/#comment-248
>Please, notice that oauth may imply some issues ab
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:21:52 +0200
Luk Claes wrote:
>Will they also not be usable anymore with identi.ca and similar twitter
>like services? If not, there is no reason to have them dropped AFAICS.
I haven't known about similar services are there, thanks!
However, at least remove "twitter"
On 06/28/2010 04:40 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
Will they also not be usable anymore with identi.ca and similar twitt
Hi,
Am Montag, den 28.06.2010, 23:40 +0900 schrieb Hideki Yamane:
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
>
> These lists are assumed to be affected packages (go
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> qwit: needs update. It should be newer than 1.1-beta.
Waiting for qoauth [1].
> Any comments are welcome. Thanks.
Please, notice that oauth may imply some issues about distributing
application secret tokens [2]. Upstream and maintainers s
On 2010-06-28, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
>
> These lists are assumed to be affected packages (got with "apt-cache searc
Hi,
As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
twitter
will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze release.
These lists are assumed to be affected packages (got with "apt-cache search
twitter").
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
