Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 14:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Personally I think this boilerplate has little to no value, cutting the > long sentence down to something like just "Rust crate foo" would help This change has now been merged and will reach Debian eventually:

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 19:05 +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > the structured metadata of crates only has a short description[0] Would the Debian Rust team be willing to talk to the upstream Rust community on adding the concept of crate long descriptions? > which is often also not very

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-21 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 10:10:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed that almost all Rust packages in Debian have boilerplate > long descriptions that aren't very useful to Debian users. The only > useful info is the crate name, but that is also in the package name. > > As far

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-21 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
It is traditional to use the ancient IBM text "This page intentionally left blank"

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi Johannes, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes: > Quoting Gard Spreemann (2023-09-20 09:26:58) >> Paul Wise writes: >> > […] since the Rust packages are basically only used as build-deps and >> > therefore have no human users. >> I just wanted to raise awareness that some of us humans do

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Gard, Quoting Gard Spreemann (2023-09-20 09:26:58) > Paul Wise writes: > > […] since the Rust packages are basically only used as build-deps and > > therefore have no human users. > I just wanted to raise awareness that some of us humans do use librust-*-dev > packages directly, having put

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Paul" == Paul Wise writes: Paul> Hi all, I have noticed that almost all Rust packages in Debian Paul> have boilerplate long descriptions that aren't very useful to Paul> Debian users. The only useful info is the crate name, but that Paul> is also in the package name.

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi, Paul Wise writes: > […] since the Rust packages are basically only used as build-deps and > therefore have no human users. I just wanted to raise awareness that some of us humans do use librust-*-dev packages directly, having put cargo in permanent offline mode and having swapped out its

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-19 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi Le mer. 20 sept. 2023, 04:11, Paul Wise a écrit : > > So I would like to suggest Debian relax our requirements around binary > package descriptions, especially for Rust binary packages. > > Does anyone object to this change? > Yes, definitely. I know it is a pain to write those texts, but

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Wise (2023-09-20 04:10:58) > I have noticed that almost all Rust packages in Debian have boilerplate > long descriptions that aren't very useful to Debian users. The only > useful info is the crate name, but that is also in the package name. > > As far as I know they inherit this

allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-19 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, I have noticed that almost all Rust packages in Debian have boilerplate long descriptions that aren't very useful to Debian users. The only useful info is the crate name, but that is also in the package name. As far as I know they inherit this property from the upstream Rust crates,