Russ Allbery writes (Re: automake transition breakages):
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Meaning one needs to get a fix once; a random NMUer might need to chase
upstream patches (never a pleasure when fixing unrelated issues). Given
what you wrote, I'm not sure what it buys us
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2013-09-30):
That's nice for well maintained packages. Not so nice when packages
start FTBFSing in the middle of a transition because of an automake
update, and maintainers are otherwise busy or MIA.
FWIW it took me less than 10 days after I wrote this to
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Russ Allbery writes (Re: automake transition breakages):
Well, the simple answer is that we avoid having to maintain local
patches against the upstream source to remove -Werror, since generally
it's not something over which we have a choice
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com (2013-09-30):
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
new upload:
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have seen these two breakages (so far):
libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
gyrus: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724917
* Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have seen these two breakages (so far):
libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
Ah yes, this has
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next)
On 30.09.2013 16:58, Eric Dorland wrote:
Doing a rebuild is something I could try for next time. I'm not really
familiar with how to do that though, can you point me in the right
direction? What sort of lintian checks did you have in mind?
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test
[ Dropping -release@ ]
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com (2013-09-30):
On 30.09.2013 16:58, Eric Dorland wrote:
Doing a rebuild is something I could try for next time. I'm not really
familiar with how to do that though, can you point me in the right
direction? What sort of
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com (2013-09-30):
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
new upload:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.*-Werror
The list is small enough that it can be done
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org (2013-09-30):
I use -Werror for Automake for all of the packages for which I'm upstream
and have not noticed it being a serious issue, although maybe I'm missing
something? But I didn't have any trouble regenerating the files for my
various packages with Automake
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Meaning one needs to get a fix once; a random NMUer might need to chase
upstream patches (never a pleasure when fixing unrelated issues). Given
what you wrote, I'm not sure what it buys us to keep -Werror in
distribution packages, except for the
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com (2013-09-30):
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
new upload:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.*-Werror
On 2013-09-30 20:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com (2013-09-30):
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
new upload:
* Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net) wrote:
On 2013-09-30 20:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com (2013-09-30):
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
O.
--
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
Did the transition from
18 matches
Mail list logo
