On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:11:21PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> No, you don't #ifdef all the users, you write multiple versions of a a
> generic function that hides the differences, and compile the appropriate
> one. Read the reference I gave.
> Sure, you *could* do this with autoconf driving
On 14-Aug-06, 17:32 (CDT), Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag 14 August 2006 23:27 schrieb Steve Greenland:
> > The *real* problem with the whole autotools disaster is that it promotes
> > a braindead idea of how to achieve portability: a #ifdef branch for
> > every different s
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> You mean the difference between manpages-posix-dev (in non-free) and
> manpages-dev (in main)? The first is not proposed by Debian (I still don't
> get why anone would want to change a standards document as not changing it
> is the whole purpose of its existence.)
In order
Am Montag 14 August 2006 23:27 schrieb Steve Greenland:
> On 14-Aug-06, 15:59 (CDT), Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst writes:
> > > In the case of autotools, the fact is that usually it's configure.ac or
> > > Makefile.am being horribly broken, rather than the autotools.
4 matches
Mail list logo
