Re: azureus upload

2006-11-22 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 11/22/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/22/06, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 01:25:54PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > >On 11/19/06, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Simple fix for you: Upload a new one, ie slightly changing

Re: azureus upload

2006-11-22 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 11/22/06, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 01:25:54PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > >On 11/19/06, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Simple fix for you: Upload a new one, ie slightly changing upstreams > >> version number. > > Any comments on this mig

Re: azureus upload

2006-11-22 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 01:25:54PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > >On 11/19/06, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Simple fix for you: Upload a new one, ie slightly changing upstreams > >> version number. > > Any comments on this migration from contrib to main? You already got the above

Re: azureus upload

2006-11-19 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 11/19/06, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, gah, im blind today, so I accepted azureus. It should have been a reject, as you now will lose the orig tarball. dak bug, sorry. Simple fix for you: Upload a new one, ie slightly changing upstreams version number. Sorry for that, but da