Re: backports tool

2007-09-03 Thread Sebastian Harl
Hi, On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > this is meant for users to use not-in-backports situation, like testing > newer software. As Romain suggested already, a chroot is much better suited for that kind of testing. Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ Gnu

Re: backports tool

2007-09-03 Thread Luis Matos
Seg, 2007-09-03 às 09:05 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez escreveu: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:09:14PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > > > > how about the development of tool on we could: > > > > - add the sid repos to sources.list > > - with a simple command download every needed source package > > (de

Re: backports tool

2007-09-03 Thread Luis Matos
Seg, 2007-09-03 às 14:46 +0200, Sebastian Harl escreveu: > Hi Luis, > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:09:14PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > > how about the development of tool on we could: > > > > - add the sid repos to sources.list > > This should be done manually, it only has to be done once anywa

Re: backports tool

2007-09-03 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:09:14PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > > how about the development of tool on we could: > > - add the sid repos to sources.list > - with a simple command download every needed source package > (dependencies) > - build the packages > - install all the packages. > A fe

Re: backports tool

2007-09-03 Thread Sebastian Harl
Hi Luis, On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:09:14PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > how about the development of tool on we could: > > - add the sid repos to sources.list This should be done manually, it only has to be done once anyway. > - with a simple command download every needed source package > (de

Re: backports tool

2007-09-03 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Monday 03 September 2007 14:09:14 Luis Matos, vous avez écrit : > is this doable? Honnestly, it seems difficult and dangerous to automate that way. when you backport a package there are plenty of reasons you should take care of dependencies, in particular when there's a major upgrade at some

backports tool

2007-09-03 Thread Luis Matos
Hello there ... i had an idea that probably someone already had ... i am using etch and i use anjuta for c/c++ development. i would try anjuta 2.2 because it seems to be a huge improvement over 1.2.4. To do that i have to put the sid sources to sources.list, re-compile some stuff and then instal