Re: bash readline

2013-06-23 Thread Jack Andrews
On 31 January 2013 21:24, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: but on ubu^H^H^Hdebian, rlwrap uses the vanilla readline and it's really annoying that i can't get the same line editing features with rlwrap (and, i expect, readline). I can confirm that. I suspect libreadline differs

Re: bash readline

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Stapelberg
happens, but in vim, this would replace “bar”. now, i haven't looked closely, but i think the good vi mode is a patch on (bash?) readline in debian? I suggest you look closely before posting: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/bash/4.2+dfsg-0.1 I see some patches on the readline code

bash readline

2013-01-30 Thread Jack Andrews
hi dd, i really like the readline in bash - it seems bash is vi complete in vi mode. now, i haven't looked closely, but i think the good vi mode is a patch on (bash?) readline in debian? in centos, i can't df; and delete up to next semicolon. but on ubu^H^H^Hdebian, rlwrap uses the vanilla