Jonathan Oxer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 10:50, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> > But isn't rsync supposed to do this? I don't know exactly how
> > efficiently it detects and compresses binary differences, but it
> > definitely does it and not too bad. With rsync, you get both the
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:50:03AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> On 2003-11-05 17:37 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It has been suggested many times in the past to apply a similar idea to
> > the .debs themselves, rather than their contents.
>
> But isn't rsync supposed to do this? I don't know
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 10:50, Martin Pitt wrote:
> But isn't rsync supposed to do this? I don't know exactly how
> efficiently it detects and compresses binary differences, but it
> definitely does it and not too bad. With rsync, you get both the easy
> management of complete debs and the bandwidth
Hi!
On 2003-11-05 17:37 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It has been suggested many times in the past to apply a similar idea to the
> .debs themselves, rather than their contents.
But isn't rsync supposed to do this? I don't know exactly how
efficiently it detects and compresses binary difference
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:52:53PM +, Anthraxz __ wrote:
> When doing a package upgrade, I wondy if it should be possible to
> implement a mecanism for patching binaries instead of replacing the new
> one ? This could be usefull for use on a slow network connection.
This would require calcula
When doing a package upgrade, I wondy if it should be possible to implement
a mecanism for patching binaries instead of replacing the new one ? This
could be usefull for use on a slow network connection.
There exist somes tools for FreeBSD http://www.daemonology.net
_
6 matches
Mail list logo
