remember:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html
well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
chrooting bind should be a debconf option of the bind9 package, or
whether i c
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:04:54AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> remember:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html
>
> well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
> chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
> c
also sprach Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.0305 +0100]:
> I vote yes for the Debconfy bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it
> insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security
> problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something.
okay. what's your st
3 matches
Mail list logo