Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Thomas! You wrote: From http://www.debian.org/devel/people, I see: Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED] main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. Probably the script that

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:23:50AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: From http://www.debian.org/devel/people, I see: Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED] main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 What's up with this? This is not a legitimate

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:47:41PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED] How the hell were you able to draw that conclusion? The script may be broken, but that it would randomly insert local data into the web pages, well that's just too stupid

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Josip! You wrote: Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED] main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. Probably the script that generates this page is broken How

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED] main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. Probably the

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-03 21:06]: On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: What I meant was: the page was apparently generated from local data (from a local /var/lib/dpkg/available perhaps?). And I said it _was not_. The broken package really was in

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:28:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: And to be honest - you could have tried to check the Packages file you get from debian archive. What, you want the devel/people script to check the validity of the emails in the Packages files? But that was quite some days

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-03 22:31]: On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:28:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: And to be honest - you could have tried to check the Packages file you get from debian archive. What, you want the devel/people script to check the validity of the emails in

bogus maintainers?

2002-01-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
From http://www.debian.org/devel/people, I see: Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED] main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. Thomas