Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we still want to support very old hardware, especially low memory system
(eg. some old sparc, and maybe old 386, 486 as well) ?
Then you also need a 1.x kernel. 2.0 is wasting mem and 2.2 doesn´t
boot on low mem maschines. I think its safe to assume 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we still want to support very old hardware, especially low memory system
(eg. some old sparc, and maybe old 386, 486 as well) ?
Then you also need a 1.x kernel. 2.0 is wasting mem and 2.2 doesn´t
boot on low mem
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
* eliminate all dselect acquisition methods aside from apt and
possibly mountable (for NFS, which apt doesn't handle -- socks
also not handled by apt but I don't know if we care)
Apt can handle nfs just fine. If you want to mount/unmount the nfs server
when apt
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Here's my unofficial boot-floppies TODO:
* build for all supported arches
* eliminate all dselect acquisition methods aside from apt and
possibly mountable (for NFS, which apt doesn't handle -- socks
also not handled by apt but I don't know if we care)
Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am on debian-boot for a long time. The truth is that a lot of people are
doing small things but nobody leads. No management. No decisions.
I would agree with this. Enrique would probably appreciate someone
taking over management and
5 matches
Mail list logo
