Re: buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 09:17:52PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > If you think that 700GB saving is not enough to split your package, > you can work on the build of your actual package to remove intermediate > built files between each parts. The best thing to do probably depends on whether the

Re: buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-17 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 17/09/2011 16:17, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > So after sending this, I think I have hit upon a solution by > splitting into multiple source packages. > > It seems that the wrapping can be done by using the installed headers > and libraries. So I can have the core source package build only the >

Re: buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-17 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:06:58PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > The main culprit behind the resource usage is the wrappers for Tcl, > Java, and Python. The underlying ITK codebase consists of heavily > templated C++ libraries. The wrapping process generates a huge amount > of code since many

Re: buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-17 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Samstag, den 17.09.2011, 11:45 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz: > On 09/17/2011 05:06 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > I am having a huge problem getting insighttoolkit (ITK) to build due > > to the fact that it takes a huge amount of disk, memory, and time to > > build. In fact, the build is n

Re: buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-17 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 09/17/2011 05:06 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi, > > I am having a huge problem getting insighttoolkit (ITK) to build due > to the fact that it takes a huge amount of disk, memory, and time to > build. In fact, the build is now generally failing because either > disk or memory is exhausted.

Re: buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-17 Thread Bill MacAllister
--On Saturday, September 17, 2011 08:40:16 AM +0200 Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:06:58PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Hi, I am having a huge problem getting insighttoolkit (ITK) to build due to the fact that it takes a huge amount of disk, memory, and time to build. In

Re: buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:06:58PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi, > > I am having a huge problem getting insighttoolkit (ITK) to build due > to the fact that it takes a huge amount of disk, memory, and time to > build. In fact, the build is now generally failing because either > disk or mem

buildd machines vs. resource-hungry packages (ITK)

2011-09-16 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, I am having a huge problem getting insighttoolkit (ITK) to build due to the fact that it takes a huge amount of disk, memory, and time to build. In fact, the build is now generally failing because either disk or memory is exhausted. The main culprit behind the resource usage is the wrappers