Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA)

"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe there should also be a clasification of packages according to > how bad would a bug be in them for the whole system, so that patches > in those could be more carefully reviewed. Perhaps uploads could come with the diff against the last version (or

Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA)

2008/5/16 Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > the topic has already been changed to "ssl security desaster", and in my > opinion this is precisely what my post is about: what can we learn from this > disaster. (More precisely, I'm giving my 2c on what level of patching is > acceptable in a Debi

Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA)

Le 16 mai 08 à 15:04, Olivier Berger a écrit : Le vendredi 16 mai 2008 à 14:48 +0200, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : Let's hope this discussion will, in the end, bring good ideas and trigger actual work to improve Debian, and perhaps the free software community at large. Best regards, Thibaut.

changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA)

Le vendredi 16 mai 2008 à 14:48 +0200, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Let's hope this discussion will, in the end, bring good ideas and > trigger actual work to improve Debian, and perhaps the free software > community at large. > > Best regards, Thibaut. > > That'd be great. But please, ma