On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:11:45PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
'linux' is a perfect name for the package. The tarballs contain that very
name.
Note that the name is choosen not only to attract the user, but also to
catch that who blindly use apt-get source linux. The user wouldn't get
This one time, at band camp, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Jamie Wilkinson [Mon, Nov 10 2003, 06:54:22PM]:
The fact of the too generic package name was mentioned before within
other arguments against your linux package. IIRC you prefered not to
answer to it but refered to an URL which
#include hallo.h
* Jamie Wilkinson [Tue, Nov 11 2003, 11:28:43PM]:
Note that the name is choosen not only to attract the user, but also to
catch that who blindly use apt-get source linux. The user wouldn't get
the well-known and good kernel-source packages but something which is
under control
Jamie Wilkinson writes:
However, this is the word 'linux'. What else do you think it could
possibly refer to?
Most people seem to think that 'Linux' is the name for the whole kit and
kaboodle: kernel, userland, and everything. They are wrong, but they still
will be confused by a package named
#include hallo.h
* Jamie Wilkinson [Mon, Nov 10 2003, 06:54:22PM]:
The fact of the too generic package name was mentioned before within
other arguments against your linux package. IIRC you prefered not to
answer to it but refered to an URL which did not contain the answers.
'linux' is a
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:11:45PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
initrd-on-cramfs fix discuss that,
You mean the kludge that craps in fs/block_dev.c? If so, feel free to
can it - the proper fix is to switch cramfs_read() to use of pagecache
and it's going
6 matches
Mail list logo
