On Saturday 01 October 2005 02:49 pm, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
>
> Paul TBBle Hampson told:
> > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
> > > Steve Langasek told:
> > >
> > >
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Paul TBBle Hampson told:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
> > Steve Langasek told:
>
> > [...]
> >> There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possibl
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
> Steve Langasek told:
> [...]
>> There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
>> convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a
>> re
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Steve Langasek told:
[...]
> There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
> convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a
> recompile due to unavailable ABI changes, but I thought it was pretty clear
> t
On Sep 30, Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> remain OpenSSL for the foreseeable future, GnuTLS is allegedly still
> slightly more buggy than OpenSSL (does anyone have any details?) and is
> lacking some features.
If you had taken some time to investigate these claims you would have
di
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:19:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:27:30PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Why is openssl the default?
> > > I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody wil
On Sep 30, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
> convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a
> recompile due to unavailable ABI changes, but I thought it was pretty clear
> that the default go
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:27:30PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Why is openssl the default?
> > I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to
> > use gnutls,
> No, as has been shown by the discussions in
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:03:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[E
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> That's actually not true, GnuTLS has the reverse licensing issues from
> OpenSSL. OpenSSL cannot be linked with GPL-licensed software; GnuTLS,
> OTOH, is licensed under the GPL (as opposed to the LGPL),
Only some extra features not present in OpenSSL (like SRP a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Why is openssl the default?
> I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to
> use gnutls,
No, as has been shown by the discussions in the last weeks, there is *no*
agreement on which SSL library should be th
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:03:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > to build something with libcurl, o
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-g
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
> > depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-d
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
> > depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
> depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or libcurl3-gnutls respectively.
Why is openssl the default?
I think everyb
hi all,
i've just uploaded curl 7.14.1-3 to experimental, it should put curl
back in a good state. i also uploaded pycurl built using curl+gnutls.
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
depend on libcurl3 (w
18 matches
Mail list logo
