On Saturday 12 March 2005 12:38 pm, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | only has use if it's a transition package depending on the renamed
> | package. Since this isn't what r-gnome will be as far as I understand
> | you, you should simply stop building r-gnome from r-base. People
> | upgrading will notic
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:30:54AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Ok, so I just did the following
>
> 1) Run 'wajig reconfigure apt-listchanges' to ensure apt-listchanges shows
>everything, even on versions we've seen before
> 2) 'wajig purge r-gnome'
> 3) 'wajig install r-gnome' and verif
On 12 March 2005 at 17:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-12 11:42]:
| > 4) Scratch my head because even though 3) uses apt-get and 1) ensure NEWS
| >should be mailed to me, and 2) ensure it is a fresh package install, I
get
| >nothing.
|
| It
On 12 March 2005 at 11:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Ok, so I just did the following
|
| 1) Run 'wajig reconfigure apt-listchanges' to ensure apt-listchanges shows
|everything, even on versions we've seen before
| 2) 'wajig purge r-gnome'
| 3) 'wajig install r-gnome' and verify with -t that
Hi Jeroen,
On 12 March 2005 at 18:09, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 10:45:00AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > The next version of R [1] ships with the previously included Gnome
front-end.
|
| without, I assume.
Yup. Thanks for spotting that from context.
| > So t
* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-12 11:42]:
> 4) Scratch my head because even though 3) uses apt-get and 1) ensure NEWS
>should be mailed to me, and 2) ensure it is a fresh package install, I get
>nothing.
It is only shown on fresh package *upgrades*, not installs.
--
Mart
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 12 March 2005 at 17:04, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-12 10:45]:
| > So the r-gnome binary package becomes an empty shell, and I would like to
| > signal that via a NEWS file (as opposed to a debconf message).
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 10:45:00AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> The next version of R [1] ships with the previously included Gnome front-end.
without, I assume.
> So the r-gnome binary package becomes an empty shell, and I would like to
> signal that via a NEWS file (as opposed to a debconf
* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-12 10:45]:
> So the r-gnome binary package becomes an empty shell, and I would like to
> signal that via a NEWS file (as opposed to a debconf message). However, in
> my tests, the NEWS file never got displayed by apt-listchanges.
apt-listchanges is
The next version of R [1] ships with the previously included Gnome front-end.
So the r-gnome binary package becomes an empty shell, and I would like to
signal that via a NEWS file (as opposed to a debconf message). However, in
my tests, the NEWS file never got displayed by apt-listchanges.
I pl
10 matches
Mail list logo
