Ian Jackson writes:
> I have said before that I think using "dgit push" (where possible) is
> an ethical imperative. (I should clarify that I *don't* mean that
> people who aren't using "dgit push" yet are bad people. Life is so
> full of ethical imperatives that no real human could meet them
Hello,
On Wed 03 Jul 2019 at 05:58pm +0100, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> At least for me, I was able to simply run 'dgit --gbp build-source &&
> dgit --gpm push' instead of 'sbuild && dput '. Mission
> accomplished.
Or `dgit --gbp push-source`! (just wanted to note this in case you
hadn't come
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The main difficulty now with getting dgit push adopted is that
> maintainers don't see the benefit *to themselves* and it is always
> harder to get someone to see a benefit *to someone else*.
Ok, that describe me. I see benefits in an
On Jul 03 2019, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> > That's the case for me. I need to admit that I did not used dgit. The
>> > reason is that I'm working in teams who all have Git repositories on
>> > Salsa that more or less are following what was described in the Perl
>> > team policy. I live under the
Andreas Tille writes ("Re: dgit advocacy again (Re: Survey results: git
packaging practices / repository format)"):
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Anyway, I'm very happy to talk to you (or anyone) about your own
> > situation in
Hi Ian,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> ...
> dgit push-source is slightly more convenient than the dput based
> system and it catches slightly more errors and does slightly more
> automatically. But, it is a fairly minor benefit *to the maintainer*.
>
> As I say,
Andreas Tille writes ("Re: dgit advocacy again (Re: Survey results: git
packaging practices / repository format)"):
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:41:34AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > People like you are precisely the intended users of "dgit push --gbp".
> >
&
Hi Ian,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:41:34AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sorry about this, but I really wanted to reply to this because I think
> it is a common misconception. I hope people who are tired of this
> subject can tell their program to delete messages with `dgit advocacy'
> in the
Sorry about this, but I really wanted to reply to this because I think
it is a common misconception. I hope people who are tired of this
subject can tell their program to delete messages with `dgit advocacy'
in the subject...
Andreas Tille writes ("Re: Survey results: git packaging practices /
9 matches
Mail list logo
