Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-08 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > >> * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]: > > >>> Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks > >>> i

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]: >>> Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks >>> instead of copies. >> I'd vote for that too, though if

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-08 Thread Raphael Geissert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]: > >> Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks >> instead of copies. > > I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the idea. M

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]: > > > Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks > > instead of copies. > > I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey ref

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:59:17AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]: > > > > > Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks > > > inst

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-08 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]: > > > Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks > > instead of copies. > > I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the idea. > I w

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]: > Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks > instead of copies. I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the idea. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.o

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > dh_movefiles(1) says that "dh_install is a much better program, and you are > > recommended to use it instead". Accordingly, I've changed the packages I've > > adop

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-10-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > dh_movefiles(1) says that "dh_install is a much better program, and you are > recommended to use it instead". Accordingly, I've changed the packages I've > adopted from using dh_movefiles to "dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp". Bu

dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

2007-09-25 Thread Magnus Holmgren
dh_movefiles(1) says that "dh_install is a much better program, and you are recommended to use it instead". Accordingly, I've changed the packages I've adopted from using dh_movefiles to "dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp". But it's not entirely clear to me just _how_ dh_install is so much bette