Hi, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> Probably. On the other hand, I think that the coverage we get from testing
>> is a lot higher than from unstable, by the simple fact that more people
>> risk using testing as their day-to-day system. (I wouldn't dream of
>> i
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Julien BLACHE wrote:
>
> > The time it takes to do a release nowadays might very well be related
> > to the use of testing. I tend to think we did better before we
> > introduced testing.
>
> Probably. On the other hand, I think that the coverage
Hi, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> The time it takes to do a release nowadays might very well be related
> to the use of testing. I tend to think we did better before we
> introduced testing.
Probably. On the other hand, I think that the coverage we get from testing
is a lot higher than from unstable, by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We are all working for the stable release, you know. We're all trying
>> to provide the best software in the best distribution. That's partly
>> why we're all trying to slip a new revision of a package under
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 14:34, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sure, and I won't say the contrary. But having a great infrastructure
> >> (which is the case) and great people doing good work is of no help in
> >> making Debian if you haven't got any packages. W
5 matches
Mail list logo
