Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 19:22 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Apr 15, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You don???t need automake for this to work, it???s just that automake does
> > things right by default. Fixing the package to get out-of-tree builds to
> > work using VPATH shou
On Apr 15, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don???t need automake for this to work, it???s just that automake does
> things right by default. Fixing the package to get out-of-tree builds to
> work using VPATH should be feasible.
Can you point me to a good example of a package usin
Le dimanche 13 avril 2008 à 17:50 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> INN uses autoconf but not automake, so mkdir bin && ./configure does
> not generate working makefiles.
(I suppose you mean ../configure)
You don’t need automake for this to work, it’s just that automake does
things right by default
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:50:39PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I am looking for *elegant* ways to build both packages from the same
> source with the least possible duplication of the code in debian/rules
> and of the debian/ debhelper files (the package is complex and needs
> much work before an
The inn2 packages is not as useful as it should be, since it does not
support LFS which is mandatory for large servers. I cannot just enable
LFS support since there is no transition path for some classes of users,
so we need both inn2 and inn2-lfs packages.
I am looking for *elegant* ways to build
5 matches
Mail list logo
