Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:56:24PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > The RC bug list REMOVE tags mean "remove from testing (not unstable)". > > If a bug's filed against ftp.d.o, there's no "trying" -- it'll be removed, > > and any packages that depend on it will be left broken. > BTW, in any case, If

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Jérôme Marant
Quoting Anthony Towns : > The RC bug list REMOVE tags mean "remove from testing (not unstable)". > > If a bug's filed against ftp.d.o, there's no "trying" -- it'll be removed, > and any packages that depend on it will be left broken. BTW, in any case, If we want to stop supporting emacs20, do w

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:54:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > >Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug > >report open against ftp.debian.org. > I seem to remember him requesting it. Further, you'll see on the RC bugs > list that it's li

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Florent Rougon
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone please tell me how to make Home and End to work as they > did in emacs20, both in console and X? (global-set-key [home] 'beginning-of-buffer) (global-set-key [?\e ?\[ ?1 ?~] 'beginning-of-buffer) (global-set-key [end]

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Jérôme Marant
Quoting Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > > Quoting Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > > > > > I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be > re

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Quoting Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > > > I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed > > > yet. > > > > Perhaps the maintainer hasn't reque

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:54:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I seem to remember him requesting it. Further, you'll see on the RC bugs > list > that it's listed as REMOVE (and has been for a while). Perhaps the bug > report was already closed (because the archive maintenance scripts are

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Jérôme Marant
Quoting Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed > > yet. > > Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug > report open again

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-18 Thread Nathanael Nerode
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed > yet. Matt Zimmerman wrote: >Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug >report open against ftp.debian.org. I seem to remem

emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

2003-11-17 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed > yet. Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug report open against ftp.debian.org. -- - mdz