Re: epoch in filenames for packages (was: Re: R 3.0.0 and required rebuilds of all reverse Depends: of R)

2013-04-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 04/18/2013 10:48, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:29:19PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> On 04/02/2013 09:18 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >>> Actually that hits another problem. Namely that the

epoch in filenames for packages (was: Re: R 3.0.0 and required rebuilds of all reverse Depends: of R)

2013-04-18 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 04/18/2013 10:48, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:29:19PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 04/02/2013 09:18 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> Actually that hits another problem. Namely that the epoch does not >>> appear in the binary package filename. While wheezy wo