Le dimanche 20 juillet 2008 à 16:05 -0500, Jason D. Clinton a écrit :
Loïc, you offered to NMU this package here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422590
This vastly improves the Gnome sound situation. Hope we can
get this in for
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Martin Pitt wrote:
That's interesting indeed! So you avoid that by using an OSS driver
instead of the ALSA one? I can
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Martin Pitt wrote:
That's interesting indeed! So you avoid that by using an OSS driver
instead of the ALSA one? I can really not imagine how esound on top of
a broken ALSA driver would sound better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am Mo den 16. Jun 2008 um 6:25 schrieb Martin Pitt:
esound should *so much* die completely. It has very poor sound quality
I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not
Hi Klaus,
Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 10:12 +0100]:
I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not that good than with OSS
direct but it is ok.)
Hm, that rather sounds like for your card the OSS driver is much
better than the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Martin,
Am Di den 17. Jun 2008 um 11:50 schrieb Martin Pitt:
Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 10:12 +0100]:
I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not that good than with
Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 14:06 +0100]:
The alternative to esound is not really ALSA, but rather pulseaudio.
Is pulsaudio supported by applications like wine for example? Do
pulsaudio work on top of OSS?
pulseaudio provides an esound ABI compatibility layer, thus it's a
drop-in replacement.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Martin Pitt wrote:
That's interesting indeed! So you avoid that by using an OSS driver
instead of the ALSA one? I can really not imagine how esound on top of
a broken ALSA driver would sound better than just using the ALSA
output directly?
It might normalize which
Le mardi 17 juin 2008 à 14:06 +0100, Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
OSS: Works well.
OSS-ESD: Works well too.
ALSA: The problems above.
ALSA-ESD: I never really tested.
Last time I checked, libesd-alsa0 was still completely unusable (well,
except for some weird kind of sound-based torture).
--
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:12:52AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Am Mo den 16. Jun 2008 um 6:25 schrieb Martin Pitt:
very poor code quality
That might be. But that's a problem of many gnome applications.
To be quite honest, I've seen the code for esd, and it is terrible.
In fact, worse than
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:44:23 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Last time I checked, libesd-alsa0 was still completely unusable (well,
except for some weird kind of sound-based torture).
I regularly help users to find out why their sound has stopped working,
and the cause is usually due to
Frans Pop [2008-06-15 20:39 +0200]:
Also, the package has had uploads of new upstream versions to Ubuntu
without getting similar uploads in Debian, but even there not by its
Debian maintainer who AFAIK is an Canonical employee.
esound should *so much* die completely. It has very poor sound
12 matches
Mail list logo
