Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-04-01 Thread Mark Hymers
On Thu, 31, Mar, 2011 at 08:25:38AM +, Philipp Kern spoke thus.. > On 2011-03-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > However, having "squeeze" in sources.list whilst the Release file > > contains "stable" works okay, so I assume apt is managing the > > translation internally in that case. > > Nah, th

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-31 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:24:09 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Because security.debian.org is not debian-mirror.lrz.de. The entries > above are for security.debian.org, whereas the error message you quoted > was for an entry containing debian-mirror.lrz.de; the entries for > security are not what

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, March 31, 2011 09:18, David Kalnischkies wrote: > Its simpler: The Release files tell us which Codename and Suite this > archive is for - if thats different from the one you mentioned in > sources.list you will get this "lovely" warningÂ… > > > And yes, Christoph is right, something is wrong

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-31 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 00:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > However, having "squeeze" in sources.list whilst the Release file > contains "stable" works okay, so I assume apt is managing the > translation internally in that case. Clarification: Thankfully it doesn't -- it would be another place to kee

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-31 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-03-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > However, having "squeeze" in sources.list whilst the Release file > contains "stable" works okay, so I assume apt is managing the > translation internally in that case. Nah, that's the bug we received and then assigned to ftp-master, which didn't fix it ye

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:10 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 22:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 20:45 +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > > Using the following in sources.list: > > > deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stabl

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-30 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 22:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 20:45 +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > Using the following in sources.list: > > deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib > > non-free > > deb-src ftp://security.debian.org/d

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
free The above is not related to the warning below. Compare the server names and suite names between the two. > I always get warnings like these: > >W: Conflicting distribution: ftp://debian.mirror.lrz.de stable-updates > Release (expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates) >

"expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-03-30 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
ftp://debian.mirror.lrz.de stable-updates Release (expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates) when updating. Is this a false warning of apt[itude] or a problem on the ftp-servers? Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe&q