On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Toens Bueker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
If I remember
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:56:21 +0100, GCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Toens Bueker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought, but naming
something after a missile seems odd.
Hamish
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
by
Töns
--
There is no safe distance.
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 11:56, Toens Bueker wrote:
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
Extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud:
Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
Extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud:
Scud is the NATO reporting name (not
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:03:57AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
it's a bit different and for different arches. What about the arches
`all'? Well, I'm maybe a particular case: powerpc +
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I think maybe many problems with using experimental as a playground for
development packages could be remedied by creating a central document
about it. Things to include might be:
* sources.lists lines
* using APT's preferences to pin packages
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the experimental distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with Sid.
I think that's the way it should be. Experimental isn't a complete
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:46:27AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Christoph Berg wrote:
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the experimental distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with Sid. I'd propose to call it Scud, which is the
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the experimental distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with Sid.
I think that's the way it
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:38:37PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Neil McGovern in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it too :)
Thanks :)
Prehaps it could be used as a codename for the new unstable when Sarge
is released as stable?
That's not the way it works; Sid is not Sarge+1 but the
Re: Neil McGovern in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it too :)
Thanks :)
Prehaps it could be used as a codename for the new unstable when Sarge
is released as stable?
That's not the way it works; Sid is not Sarge+1 but the never-to-be-
released development version. Think of it as version infinity.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that's the way it should be. Experimental isn't a complete
distribution in the sense that the others are, so it doesn't really
deserve a codename.
Isn't it possible that `scud'
John Hasler writes:
gram writes:
Every new package, or every new upload?
Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
Experimental should go to Experimental only. Nothing would ever move
gram writes:
Every new package, or every new upload?
Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
Experimental should go to Experimental only. Nothing would ever move from
Experimental to any
Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Hasler writes:
gram writes:
Every new package, or every new upload?
Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
Experimental should go to
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
What I'm trying to explain is that I like the idea of an extra pool
with the buildd and bts but no automatic move to another pool. I
think, DD and people with chroot can point to
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this would lead to more developers and beta-testers being able to
use experimental, then I think this would be a good idea. People might
upload there newer more in-development packages
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
it's a bit different and for different arches. What about the arches
`all'? Well, I'm maybe a particular case: powerpc + java ;) but it
could be the same with sparc + perl or else.
Scripsit Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I am not (nor do I believe a majority might be) that
experimental should duplicate unstable, with only a few packages (the
experimental ones) being newer. However, with the pool structure
archive, this might not actually mean a duplication of
Hi,
Christoph Berg wrote:
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the experimental distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with Sid. I'd propose to call it Scud, which is the
Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid did ;-).
Hello,
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the experimental distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with Sid. I'd propose to call it Scud, which is the
Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid did ;-).
Christoph
[1]
23 matches
Mail list logo