Am Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:21:56 +0400
schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
> Well, and how does _your_ proposal implement _full_ choice?
IMHO we are at a place to suggest constructive answers and enhancements
to proposals. Everybody lives happily with things they don't need
nor are affected by.
Regards,
Chr
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:36:09AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> Am Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:43:20 +0400
> schrieb Stanislav Maslovski :
>
> > > The great thing about Debian is that it can mean and handle so many
> > > different things for so many people.
> >
> > Yes, that is why we should not limit
Hi!
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 13:00:23 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:35AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> [skipped]
>
> BTW, mutt seems to incorrectly fill the References: header when I
> reply to your mail.
>
> Just a second test. Please ignore...
That's because C
Am Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:43:20 +0400
schrieb Stanislav Maslovski :
> > The great thing about Debian is that it can mean and handle so many
> > different things for so many people.
>
> Yes, that is why we should not limit it to a fixed number of
> predefined choices.
Configurable defaults should i
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:59:18AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:53:03 +0400
> schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
>
> > But why Debian should care about the precise details of local
> > admistration policies?
>
> If you have read #248130
Yes, I have.
> and know debian,
I am wit
Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:53:03 +0400
schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
> But why Debian should care about the precise details of local
> admistration policies?
If you have read #248130 and know debian, you probably know local
details are usually nicely configurable. You probably also know about
debconf,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:35AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
[skipped]
BTW, mutt seems to incorrectly fill the References: header when I
reply to your mail.
Just a second test. Please ignore...
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:35AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:20:00 +0400 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski
> :
>
> Do not worry. They are not to be created by default.
> If you read the subject it even explicitly reads "optionally
> create".
>
> > Those things should be under
Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:20:00 +0400
schrieb Stanislav Maslovski :
> > But where/how should those things be created best?
>
> Should not be created at all on default installs, thanks.
Do not worry. They are not to be created by default.
If you read the subject it even explicitly reads "optionally
c
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:23:00PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
>
> If collaboration among users should work nicely out of the box, we will
> finally need three small things. I am not sure in which package some of
> them should go, though.
>
> 1) An install? option to populate /etc/skel/ with the
If collaboration among users should work nicely out of the box, we will
finally need three small things. I am not sure in which package some of
them should go, though.
1) An install? option to populate /etc/skel/ with the special permission
directories private/(rwx--) and incoming/ (rwsrws-wt
11 matches
Mail list logo
