Re: fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-19 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
Mark Baker wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote: > > That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is > > thinking about a switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate > > there. > > Someone should tell them about GTK, now tha

Re: fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-18 Thread Mark Baker
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote: > > That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking about a > > switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there. > > Someone should tell them about GTK, now that version 1.0 has been released. > A little bit of

Re: fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-17 Thread Anthony Fok
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 12:57:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking about a > > switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there. > > I got the impression that

RE: fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-17 Thread Meskes, Michael
/4670-44 Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 12:57 PM > To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: fltk and XForms compliance >

Re: fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-17 Thread jdassen
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking about a > switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there. I got the impression that KLyX is a forked version, and that the LyX maintianers are trying to make cle

Re: fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-17 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > Shaleh writes: > > The author has stated that this is no longer a goal of his library. > > Also, many of the XForms apps that we use would require modifications > > because the author of fltk did not re-create anything that took an

Re: fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-17 Thread Michael Meskes
Shaleh writes: > The author has stated that this is no longer a goal of his library. > Also, many of the XForms apps that we use would require modifications > because the author of fltk did not re-create anything that took an X > type as an argument (like XEvent). It is possible to make the XForm

fltk and XForms compliance

1998-04-16 Thread Shaleh
The author has stated that this is no longer a goal of his library. Also, many of the XForms apps that we use would require modifications because the author of fltk did not re-create anything that took an X type as an argument (like XEvent). It is possible to make the XForm apps work w/ fltk, how