Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-23 Thread Andreas Metzler
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ Moved to debian-devel, I don't think this is relevant to private as > the GNU crack is well publicised ] > On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 14:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote: [...] >> If we're going to make a statement about it, we should have some facts to >> r

Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-21 Thread Peter Karlsson
Scott James Remnant: If you read the script, I did, but I couldn't figure out what was the input. The only MD5 sums that GNU have provided are for 2.4, 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 Right. I sent them an update mail earlier this week, but I guess they're quite busy at the moment... -- \\// Peter - http://www.s

Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Since "b" has no effect in Debian anyway, it's not worth thinking about > anymore. :-) ...except to swear under our breath about upstreams who sneak in changes without bumping the version number (I personally find this very annoying).

Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-20 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 20:16, Peter Karlsson wrote: > Scott James Remnant: > > > No problem, this is only a quick run -- others may find ways to improve > > this script somewhat. > > What did you use to determine which packages to check? I notice that at > least my package for GNU jwhois is mis

Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-20 Thread Joey Hess
Scott James Remnant wrote: > No problem, this is only a quick run -- others may find ways to improve > this script somewhat. > !! xaos: xaos_3.0.orig.tar.gz NOT OK (e0e66a873b6d5193a79bc89345992d6b != > 5a63c3b696821e5d5d566ad9da308117) Diff shows the following differences: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/

Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-20 Thread Peter Karlsson
Scott James Remnant: No problem, this is only a quick run -- others may find ways to improve this script somewhat. What did you use to determine which packages to check? I notice that at least my package for GNU jwhois is missing from your list (although I know that the Debian version is correct

Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:25:31PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > [ Moved to debian-devel, I don't think this is relevant to private as > the GNU crack is well publicised ] It is, in general, very poor taste to make this choice for others by reposting their content from a private forum to

Re: ftp.gnu.org cracked

2003-08-20 Thread Scott James Remnant
[ Moved to debian-devel, I don't think this is relevant to private as the GNU crack is well publicised ] On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 14:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:35:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:51, Robert Millan wrote: > > > What do you s