Jérémy Lal wrote:
> pristine-tar pristine-tar-1.0.x
You should never need more than one pristine-tar branch for a package.
(Unless you're importing pristine tarballs that have identical
filenames, but different content.)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hi jérémy,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> What's the best way to name gbp branches ?
> I thought of something like :
> 2.0 1.0.x
> mastermaster-1.0.x
> upstream upstream-1.0.x
> pristine-tar pristine-tar
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:46:13 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi,
> if one manages two versions of a software :
> 2.0, the latest, which goes to experimental
> and 1.0.x, still maintained by upstream, going to unstable.
>
> What's the best way to name gbp branches ?
> I thought of something like :
> 2.
Hi,
if one manages two versions of a software :
2.0, the latest, which goes to experimental
and 1.0.x, still maintained by upstream, going to unstable.
What's the best way to name gbp branches ?
I thought of something like :
2.0 1.0.x
master master-1.0.x
upstre
4 matches
Mail list logo
