Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Hi *,
[libusb-dependent packages not making it into Woody]
sane-backends has two RC bugs, one of which has been open for more than a
week. 139509 appears like it should get sane-backends to build on mips; it's
not clear what'll fix it on alpha, but
I don't understand why all theses packages are not entering woody.
As Julien explained, everything seems to be clean.
I believe we need some manual help.
Thanks,
Christophe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Hi *,
Hi Anthony Towns,
Would it be possible to remove the current gphoto2 package (final-1) from woody
?
It is clearly broken until the new libusb enter woody and when libusb
arrive a new gphoto2 will follow.
I am afraid that gphoto2 will be broken in the official woody release if
the release
christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
The sane problem is apparently solved and gphoto2 2.0final-3 is build on
arm.
Not exactly. I uploaded another NMU, now sane-backends should build on
SPARC (and hopefully HPPA but it's not critical). It will be installed
Thank you for taking care of sane.
Christophe
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:13:18PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
The sane problem is apparently solved and gphoto2 2.0final-3 is build on
arm.
Not exactly. I uploaded
5 matches
Mail list logo