Re: how-to push a package in testing ?

2002-04-11 Thread Julien BLACHE
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: Hi *, [libusb-dependent packages not making it into Woody] sane-backends has two RC bugs, one of which has been open for more than a week. 139509 appears like it should get sane-backends to build on mips; it's not clear what'll fix it on alpha, but

Re: how-to push a package in testing ?

2002-04-11 Thread christophe barb
I don't understand why all theses packages are not entering woody. As Julien explained, everything seems to be clean. I believe we need some manual help. Thanks, Christophe On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: Hi *,

Re: how-to push a package in testing ?

2002-04-07 Thread christophe barb
Hi Anthony Towns, Would it be possible to remove the current gphoto2 package (final-1) from woody ? It is clearly broken until the new libusb enter woody and when libusb arrive a new gphoto2 will follow. I am afraid that gphoto2 will be broken in the official woody release if the release

Re: how-to push a package in testing ?

2002-04-07 Thread Julien BLACHE
christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi *, The sane problem is apparently solved and gphoto2 2.0final-3 is build on arm. Not exactly. I uploaded another NMU, now sane-backends should build on SPARC (and hopefully HPPA but it's not critical). It will be installed

Re: how-to push a package in testing ?

2002-04-07 Thread christophe barb
Thank you for taking care of sane. Christophe On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:13:18PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi *, The sane problem is apparently solved and gphoto2 2.0final-3 is build on arm. Not exactly. I uploaded