Re: icu, vips transition to testing

2005-09-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:30:06PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > >> Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and > >> vips appear to be not transitioning to test

Re: icu, vips transition to testing

2005-09-19 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > >> Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and >> vips appear to be not transitioning to testing because of making >> packages uninstallable on alpha (according to

Re: icu, vips transition to testing

2005-09-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and > vips appear to be not transitioning to testing because of making > packages uninstallable on alpha (according to > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=

icu, vips transition to testing

2005-09-19 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and vips appear to be not transitioning to testing because of making packages uninstallable on alpha (according to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=icu and corresponding for vips), but I don't see any evidence that they