On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote:
I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct
procedure for getting these bugs closed?
The changelog looks like this:
ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* well 125744 was fixed, but I put the files in the
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote:
I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct
procedure for getting these bugs closed?
The changelog looks like this:
ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable;
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct
procedure for getting these bugs closed?
Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can
tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed'
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:34:13PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Read up on the BTS docs, but the common ways are:
Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: close 140049
No! Don't fucking do that!
Geez, how many times does one have to repeat that.
--
2. That which causes joy or
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote:
Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can
tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, if Craig hasn't done it by the end of today I will do that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 03:04:43PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote:
Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can
tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, if Craig hasn't done it
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote:
Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is,
why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer
closing them.
OK, done. I just don't want to step on anyone's toes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote:
Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is,
why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer
closing them.
OK, done. I just don't want to step on
(I have CCd to debian-devel in case you are on holiday or otherwise
indisposed to close these)
ilisp is being removed from woody because of a bug that is fixed but not
closed. According to your changelog the following bugs are fixed, but are not
closed:
125744
140049
138669
137011
98132
9 matches
Mail list logo