Re: insmod.static

2011-05-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 20, Bastian Blank wrote: > This would be wasting one package or lets say 800k on every system just > to please one really specific use case, which can be and is already > solved another way. Also, I have not looked at febootstrap but if it implements its own init then it could probably eas

Re: insmod.static

2011-05-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:56:12PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I received a request to add insmod.static to the module-init-tools > package, but I do not really like either solution. > Does anybody have an opinion about this? Don't. There exists a klibc linked insmod that n

insmod.static

2011-05-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
I received a request to add insmod.static to the module-init-tools package, but I do not really like either solution. Does anybody have an opinion about this? - Forwarded message from "Richard W.M. Jones" - From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: Marco d'Itri , Gu