On May 20, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This would be wasting one package or lets say 800k on every system just
> to please one really specific use case, which can be and is already
> solved another way.
Also, I have not looked at febootstrap but if it implements its own init
then it could probably eas
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:56:12PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I received a request to add insmod.static to the module-init-tools
> package, but I do not really like either solution.
> Does anybody have an opinion about this?
Don't. There exists a klibc linked insmod that n
I received a request to add insmod.static to the module-init-tools
package, but I do not really like either solution.
Does anybody have an opinion about this?
- Forwarded message from "Richard W.M. Jones" -
From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
To: Marco d'Itri , Gu
3 matches
Mail list logo