Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Justin Maurer wrote: Justin, can you find out if those machines are binary compatible. I've heard that there are two general types flying around (5i and 3i, iirc). I wonder if one new architecture is enough or if we need both - like for mips. which two machines? the ones the puffins

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Martin Schulze
Justin Maurer wrote: consider this my intent to package pa-risc egcs and binutils. the kernel, when one arrives, too. i speak with the puffins (www.thepuffingroup.com, for those who don't know) on a daily basis, so i suppose i am a good candidate. i plan to order myself a machine when my

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Justin Maurer
(me saying a bootable kernel is still quite aways off) I wonder if this ITP is a little bit early then... well, sort of. i can still package the cross compilers and such, so that we will all be ready for it. but the new arch obviously is still another relase or two away. i have binutils

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote: well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx e.g, /usr/bin/parisc-egcs /usr/bin/parisc-as etc. You should really use standard gnu style, such as parisc-linux-{gcc,as,ld,...} and

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Joel Klecker
At 14:56 -0400 1999-05-18, Ben Collins wrote: On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote: well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx e.g, /usr/bin/parisc-egcs /usr/bin/parisc-as etc. You should really use standard gnu style, such as