Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-11-03 Thread Santiago Vila
The problem is still here: Received: from sanvila by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1EXVub-0007ob-00; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:37:13 -0600 Received: from spohr.debian.org [140.211.166.43] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ESyC9-00044c-00;

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-11-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Marc Haber wrote: On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:34:49 +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:52, Marc Haber wrote: I can confirm that master sits on some messages for days, such as this one, for example: |Received: from master.debian.org ([146.82.138.7]) |

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-31 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jochen Voss: Hello, On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:04:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: There were also some bugs for tetex-* that were never sent to the Maintainer: field, namely the debian-tetex-maint mailing list. Here is another one. The following message (related to bug #335689) spend

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-31 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Florian Weimer said: * Jochen Voss: Hello, On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:04:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: There were also some bugs for tetex-* that were never sent to the Maintainer: field, namely the debian-tetex-maint mailing list. Here is another one.

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-31 Thread Jochen Voss
Hi Florian, On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:33:53AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: Given kasserver.com's recent connectivity issues, I wouldn't consider that admissable evidence. 8-P I thought these were resolved as of 24 October. Were there problems afterwards? And then there is still this 5 and a

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-30 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:04:02 +0200, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only just now (Saturday) received the message from a mailing list I had sent last Tuesday. I know the message reached the mailing fine since I already received replies to it on the

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-30 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:52, Marc Haber wrote: I can confirm that master sits on some messages for days, such as this one, for example: |Received: from master.debian.org ([146.82.138.7]) |by torres.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.54) |id 1EVmC6-lm-8a |for [EMAIL

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-30 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:34:49 +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:52, Marc Haber wrote: I can confirm that master sits on some messages for days, such as this one, for example: |Received: from master.debian.org ([146.82.138.7]) |by

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-30 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:04:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: There were also some bugs for tetex-* that were never sent to the Maintainer: field, namely the debian-tetex-maint mailing list. Here is another one. The following message (related to bug #335689) spend six days in the

is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-29 Thread Drew Parsons
I only just now (Saturday) received the message from a mailing list I had sent last Tuesday. I know the message reached the mailing fine since I already received replies to it on the Tuesday. But the original message only just came in. The headers say the message was received by

Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?

2005-10-29 Thread Frank Küster
Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only just now (Saturday) received the message from a mailing list I had sent last Tuesday. I know the message reached the mailing fine since I already received replies to it on the Tuesday. But the original message only just came in. There were also