On Wed, 07 Oct 1998, Dan Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
I study law. And I can tell you that there´s not a problem with the GPL
licence in the KDE project. Even if the GPL (read very narrowly and
literally)
prohibited the use of QT,
Russell Coker wrote:
I have one question to that - in what way does distributing a
binary suddenly resolve a licence conflict? According to the GPL,
GPL'd code can not be linked to QT; _only_ the author of a given piece
of code has the right to make an exception to that rule. Because the
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
I study law. And I can tell you that there´s not a problem with the GPL
licence in the KDE project. Even if the GPL (read very narrowly and literally)
prohibited the use of QT, every judge/lawyer would reinterpret this
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
Hi Rainer, thanks for the package and the announcement. Just one minor
detail:
We should not repeat that Debian nonsene in public. Of course, korganizer
does
That's what I really like about this kind of discussion.
On Sun, 04 Oct 1998, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
I packages korganizer for Debian. Currently it is not on the Debian
ftp server, because of license problems (GPL programs linked against
commercial libraries).
Hi Rainer, thanks for the package and the announcement. Just one minor detail:
We should
5 matches
Mail list logo
