Re: openmotif is now LGPL, retirement of lesstif in jessie?

2012-12-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Paul Paul Gevers debian.org> writes: > > The openmotif package has recently been orphaned since the maintainer > > is MIA. > > Not quite, the maintainer said he didn't have time anymore. It is a > detail anyway. My apologies, I assumed the package becoming orphaned was a result of me emaili

Re: openmotif is now LGPL, retirement of lesstif in jessie?

2012-12-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:01:37PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > If he agrees, we could start with packaging the next version already in > experimental. Although of course, we should be focusing on releasing > Wheezy right now. I would suggest then that you guys work togther and even might have a l

Re: openmotif is now LGPL, retirement of lesstif in jessie?

2012-12-24 Thread Paul Gevers
f What do others on this list think? I think openmotif as the source package name is a fine, but I don't really care. The only thing that I like about keeping the name is that the history of the package is better linked in the PTS and such. > and replace lesstif in jessie. Let'

Re: openmotif is now LGPL, retirement of lesstif in jessie?

2012-12-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi All The openmotif package has recently been orphaned since the maintainer is MIA. I have been working on a new packaging of the LGPL motif from scratch using dh. I would like to see the openmotif package renamed to motif and replace lesstif in jessie. My motif package will be available in my

Re: openmotif is now LGPL, retirement of lesstif in jessie?

2012-12-23 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, I for one would be glad to see openmotif in jessie, as I have a package planned, MetView, which has recently been relicensed as open source, but uses OpenMotif. In particular it uses a layout widget which doesn't work in lesstif. (MetView is in active development and increasingly use

Re: openmotif is now LGPL, retirement of lesstif in jessie?

2012-12-23 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 07:56:06PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Of course, we still have to release wheezy, but may I (also with my > lesstif co-maintainer hat on) already suggest to get rid of lesstif for > jessie. > > What do you think? Sounds reasonable to me, especially since l

openmotif is now LGPL, retirement of lesstif in jessie?

2012-12-23 Thread Paul Gevers
at we can get rid of a less optimal situation where we were using a less than complete open source replacement, lesstif, to build programs needing the motif widgetset. The last couple of years lesstif has annoyed users quite a lot because the elementary copy/paste functionality was not pro

lesstif

2007-04-16 Thread costin c
How compatible is lesstif with openmotif ? A lot of examples from Motif Programming Manual return some errors like this one: simplespin_value.c:108: error: 'XmNwrap' undeclared (first use in this function) simplespin_value.c:108: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported

Re: Lesstif bug breaking other software, no action for two months

2005-04-13 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:06:43PM +0300, Kimmo Jukarainen wrote: > There are two[1] open bugs: > > * #287187 assigned to lesstif1-1, priority important > * #279402 assigned to xastir, priority minor[2] > > that are essentially the same: A bug in lesstif breaks menus of &

Lesstif bug breaking other software, no action for two months

2005-04-13 Thread Kimmo Jukarainen
There are two[1] open bugs: * #287187 assigned to lesstif1-1, priority important * #279402 assigned to xastir, priority minor[2] that are essentially the same: A bug in lesstif breaks menus of software that are using it. I've provided information about a working patch on both of

Re: Netscape packages and lesstif

1998-10-19 Thread Avery Pennarun
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 06:34:40AM -0400, Gregory S. Stark wrote: > The dmotif netscape packages seem to depend on lesstif, does this mean you can > run them with just lesstif? Or is that in addition to requiring real Motif > libraries? I'm surprised (but happily so) since i thought

Netscape packages and lesstif

1998-10-18 Thread Gregory S. Stark
The dmotif netscape packages seem to depend on lesstif, does this mean you can run them with just lesstif? Or is that in addition to requiring real Motif libraries? I'm surprised (but happily so) since i thought lesstif aimed only at source-level compatibility not binary level. greg

RE: lesstif

1998-10-12 Thread Guenter Geiger
Same for me, snd doesn´t work with current lesstif version Guenter

Re: lesstif

1998-10-09 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 11:15:09AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > I was right in that lesstif causes my problems. After reverting to the hamm > version everything is fine again. So there either is a bug in lesstifg or an > incompatibility. Odd. I've recently been coding a simple Mot

lesstif

1998-10-08 Thread Michael Meskes
I was right in that lesstif causes my problems. After reverting to the hamm version everything is fine again. So there either is a bug in lesstifg or an incompatibility. Michael -- Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers! Senior-Consultant | business

Re: lesstif?

1996-09-27 Thread Klee Dienes
I believe the canonical source for the lesstif libraries is ftp://ftp.hungry/pub/hungry/lesstif. There's a debianized version of lesstif in Incoming/ on master. It's based on the 0.50 release, though I doubt it'd be all that hard to upgrade to the in-progress version. -- TO U

Re: lesstif?

1996-09-27 Thread Dale Scheetz
Don't you just hate it when people answer their own questions? I finally found what I needed (I hope) at ftp://ftp.uoknor.edu/linux/sunsite/X11/libs/ Sorry to be a bother, Dwarf -- aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1

lesstif?

1996-09-27 Thread Dale Scheetz
I have been looking for the source to the lesstif libraries so I can use them to build grok. So far all altavista searches have provided URLs that don't respond. Does anyone have any idea where this library can be found? (preferably source) Thanks,

Bug#4355: lesstif-dev has incoorect location for include files<

1996-09-01 Thread Klee Dienes
#x27;ve left the header files where they were, and changed lesstif to include the following two symlinks: /usr/include/Xm -> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xm /usr/X11R6/include/Xm -> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xm I'm certainly open to further debate, though --- I'm just doing this now t

Bug#4355: lesstif-dev has incoorect location for include files

1996-08-31 Thread Michael Meskes
Package: lesstif-dev Version: 0.50-1 The header files are placed under /usr/include/X11/Xm. However, thex shoudl go in /usr/include/Xm since they include others with: #include Michael -- Michael Meskes |_ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED