Re: libcurl3-dev's reverse Build-Depends

2005-10-19 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:24:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:03:14AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > > Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages > > > are > > >

Re: libcurl3-dev's reverse Build-Depends

2005-10-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:03:14AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages > > are > > now FTBFS because their Build-Depends on libcurl3-dev cannot be satisfied.

Re: libcurl3-dev's reverse Build-Depends

2005-10-19 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages are > now FTBFS because their Build-Depends on libcurl3-dev cannot be satisfied. > Would you consider providing a transition libcurl3-dev package for now, o

libcurl3-dev's reverse Build-Depends

2005-10-19 Thread Daniel Schepler
Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages are now FTBFS because their Build-Depends on libcurl3-dev cannot be satisfied. Would you consider providing a transition libcurl3-dev package for now, or making libcurl3-openssl-dev provide libcurl3-dev? -- Unless it's yo