On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:24:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:03:14AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > > Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages
> > > are
> > >
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:03:14AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages
> > are
> > now FTBFS because their Build-Depends on libcurl3-dev cannot be satisfied.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages are
> now FTBFS because their Build-Depends on libcurl3-dev cannot be satisfied.
> Would you consider providing a transition libcurl3-dev package for now, o
Since libcurl3-dev was removed from unstable, suddenly a lot of packages are
now FTBFS because their Build-Depends on libcurl3-dev cannot be satisfied.
Would you consider providing a transition libcurl3-dev package for now, or
making libcurl3-openssl-dev provide libcurl3-dev? -- Unless it's yo
4 matches
Mail list logo