On Sun, 6 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:27:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Is there any reason why libggi2 from unstable is not in testing? All
> > architectures have now been compiled, being all present and up-to-date in
> > the pool, but update-excuses gives no
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:27:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Is there any reason why libggi2 from unstable is not in testing? All
> architectures have now been compiled, being all present and up-to-date in
> the pool, but update-excuses gives no hints as to why it hasn't been
> accepted in test
Is there any reason why libggi2 from unstable is not in testing? All
architectures have now been compiled, being all present and up-to-date in
the pool, but update-excuses gives no hints as to why it hasn't been
accepted in testing. It (update-output) mumbles something incoherent about
the packag
3 matches
Mail list logo
